Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target | Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target |
Encyclopedia

Muscat Stock Exchange (MSM) vs GCC Stock Exchanges: Comparison

Comparing Muscat Stock Exchange (MSM) and GCC Stock Exchanges in the context of Oman and GCC development

Overview

The Muscat Stock Exchange operates in a GCC landscape dominated by larger, more liquid markets in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Understanding MSM’s position relative to regional peers informs strategies for capital market development in Oman.

Muscat Stock Exchange (MSM)

The MSM lists approximately 110 companies with a total market capitalisation of roughly USD 25 billion. Trading volumes are relatively low, and liquidity is a persistent challenge. The exchange has introduced ETFs, REITs, and a regulatory framework for Islamic instruments. Recent government share offerings, including partial privatisations, have boosted listings and trading activity. MSM has adopted international reporting standards and upgraded its trading platform.

GCC Stock Exchanges

Saudi Arabia’s Tadawul is the largest GCC exchange with a market capitalisation exceeding USD 3 trillion following Saudi Aramco’s listing. The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and Dubai Financial Market together approach USD 1 trillion. Qatar Exchange exceeds USD 150 billion. These exchanges benefit from larger economies, more listed companies, and inclusion in major emerging market indices like MSCI, which attracts passive fund inflows.

Key Differences

MSM’s market capitalisation is a fraction of its GCC peers. Liquidity and free float percentages are lower, limiting international investor participation. Larger exchanges benefit from index inclusion, which drives institutional investment flows. MSM has fewer listed companies and less sector diversity. However, MSM offers competitive valuations compared to larger GCC markets.

Verdict / Bottom Line

MSM’s development requires a virtuous cycle of new listings, improved liquidity, and international investor participation. Government privatisations can catalyse this cycle. Achieving MSCI emerging market inclusion, even for frontier status, would transform investor access. Oman should also consider cross-listing agreements and market-making programmes to enhance liquidity.