Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target | Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target |
Encyclopedia

Oman's Sovereign Wealth Management vs Norway's Government Pension Fund Global: Comparison

Comparing Oman's Sovereign Wealth Management and Norway's Government Pension Fund Global in the context of Oman and GCC development

Overview

Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global, commonly known as the oil fund, is the world’s gold standard for sovereign wealth management. Comparing it with Oman’s approach to managing hydrocarbon wealth highlights differences in institutional design and investment philosophy.

Oman’s Sovereign Wealth Management

Oman’s sovereign wealth is managed primarily through the Oman Investment Authority (OIA), created in 2020 by merging the State General Reserve Fund and other investment vehicles. OIA manages assets estimated at approximately USD 40 to 50 billion. The fund invests both domestically and internationally, balancing development investment needs with long-term wealth preservation. Governance and transparency have improved under the new structure, but public disclosure of fund performance and holdings remains limited compared to international best practice.

Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global

Norway’s GPFG manages over USD 1.7 trillion, making it the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund. The fund invests exclusively outside Norway to avoid distorting the domestic economy and is managed by Norges Bank Investment Management with strict ethical investment guidelines. The fund publishes detailed quarterly reports, discloses all holdings, and operates under a clear fiscal rule that limits annual government withdrawals to approximately 3 percent of fund value.

Key Differences

Norway’s fund is roughly 35 times larger than Oman’s and operates with significantly greater transparency. Norway separates domestic spending from fund management through its fiscal rule, while Oman uses sovereign wealth for both development investment and fiscal stabilisation. Norway’s public disclosure of holdings and performance is exceptional; Oman’s reporting is improving but remains less comprehensive. Norway’s fund invests exclusively abroad, while OIA maintains significant domestic holdings.

Verdict / Bottom Line

Oman cannot replicate Norway’s fund scale, but it can adopt governance best practices: transparent reporting, independent management, clear fiscal rules governing withdrawals, and ethical investment guidelines. Establishing a credible fiscal rule that limits spending from sovereign wealth would strengthen fiscal sustainability and investor confidence in Oman’s long-term economic management.