Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target | Non-Oil GDP Share: 70.5% ▲ +9.5pp vs 2017 | QS Ranking — SQU: #334 ▲ ↑28 places | Fiscal Balance: +2.8% GDP ▲ 3rd surplus year | CPI Rank: 50th ▲ +20 places | Global Innovation Index: 69th ▲ +10 vs 2022 | Green H₂ Pipeline: $30B+ ▲ 2 new deals 2025 | Gross Public Debt: ~35% GDP ▲ ↓ from 44% | Digitalised Procedures: 2,680 ▲ of 2,869 target |
Encyclopedia

Oman's Governance Framework vs OECD Governance Standards: Comparison

Comparing Oman's Governance Framework and OECD Governance Standards in the context of Oman and GCC development

Overview

Comparing Oman’s governance framework with OECD standards helps identify areas where institutional reform could enhance government effectiveness, transparency, and accountability. OECD best practices provide a useful benchmark for Vision 2040’s governance objectives.

Oman’s Governance Framework

Oman’s governance system features a centralised executive authority with advisory legislative councils (Majlis al-Shura and Majlis al-Dawla). The Basic Law provides the constitutional framework. Recent reforms include public financial management improvements, establishment of a national audit institution, and digital government services. Vision 2040 emphasises the rule of law, regulatory quality, and government effectiveness as governance priorities.

OECD Governance Standards

OECD governance standards emphasise open government, regulatory impact assessment, public procurement transparency, independent audit institutions, evidence-based policymaking, and stakeholder engagement. OECD members typically have independent judiciaries, freedom of information laws, open data portals, and active civil society participation in policy formulation. These standards reflect decades of institutional development in advanced economies.

Key Differences

Oman’s governance has improved significantly but differs from OECD norms in several areas: legislative authority is advisory rather than sovereign, judicial independence is evolving, freedom of information frameworks are less developed, and civil society participation in policymaking is more limited. Oman scores well on government effectiveness and regulatory quality relative to the broader MENA region but below OECD averages.

Verdict / Bottom Line

Oman need not replicate OECD governance models wholesale, but selectively adopting best practices in regulatory impact assessment, open data, and procurement transparency would strengthen institutional quality. Governance reform is a slow process that must respect cultural and political context while steadily building institutional capacity and accountability mechanisms.